Belkin’s ScreenForce TemperedGlass screen protector feels like a leftover from six years ago. Ranked #17 out of 20+ screen protectors in our latest testing, it underperforms in nearly every category. From design flaws and outdated install tools to weak protection and poor smudge resistance, this product just doesn’t cut it in 2025. Let’s break it down.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Above-average clarity (0.92) | Extremely high glare (+19.55%) |
| Scratch resistant to 7H | Very weak edge strength (55.26N) |
| Basic protection still intact | Weak oleophobic coating |
| Covers cutouts fully | Poor install tools and uneven fit |
| Reasonable price ($19.99) | Feels outdated and poorly finished |
Design
Design-wise, the Belkin ScreenForce ranks #16. It uses standard tempered glass, which isn’t inherently bad—but there’s nothing premium about its execution. It covers 92.33% of the iPhone’s face, one of the smallest among recent contenders. The edges are flat, and yes, that becomes a problem later. Cutouts are fully covered, but that’s where the positives stop.
Installation is minimal and unimpressive. You get a basic frame, dust stickers, and a microfiber cloth. The fit was uneven out of the box, and we had to reposition it ourselves. For a product in this price range, it should be better finished and easier to install.
Performance
The Belkin ScreenForce ranks #17 in performance. It retains 0.92 of the iPhone’s clarity—above the 0.9 average—but that’s the only thing it gets right. Glare levels jump by 19.55%, more than triple the average of 5.64%. You’ll definitely notice that under direct lighting.
Things get worse with the oleophobic coating. Oil droplets took 69.61 seconds to travel the test surface—indicating major friction. Worse yet, the residue left behind was streaky and heavy. This coating just doesn’t do its job, meaning more smudges and constant wiping.
Protection
Protection is barely passable. The Belkin ScreenForce ranks #14. It scratched lightly at 6H and noticeably at 7H, which is pretty typical. But remember those flat edges? They broke at just 55.26N—well below the 86.18N average. These edges will chip easily from daily wear or minor drops.
Impact resistance was also subpar. It took just 211.5N to break the protector in our sharp impact test, compared to the 271.44N average. In short, this protector lacks the strength to confidently handle real-world bumps and drops.
Value
For $19.99, you get a single poorly-performing screen protector and a generic install kit. The base glass may have decent clarity, but the finish, edge strength, coating, and install experience feel outdated. There are better options for less—ones that offer real protection and polish.
Verdict
Belkin’s ScreenForce TemperedGlass is a relic. It doesn’t perform like a modern screen protector and lacks the features, durability, and clarity retention we expect today. The design is weak, the install tools are barebones, and the oleophobic coating is one of the worst we’ve seen. There’s no reason to recommend this screen protector—don’t give Belkin your money.