If a product is called “UltraGlass,” you’d expect it to perform like one of the best—but the Belkin ScreenForce UltraGlass 2 doesn’t live up to that name. Ranked #10 out of 20+ screen protectors we tested, it’s a middle-of-the-pack option with good clarity but disappointing durability, protection, and oleophobic coating. Let’s take a closer look.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Above-average clarity (0.92) | Poor oleophobic coating (slow + streaky) |
| Improved edge polish vs. older Belkin | High glare increase (+10.98%) |
| Scratch resistant to 7H | Underwhelming edge durability (67.14N) |
| Includes antibacterial coating | Overpriced for what it offers ($40 for 1) |
| Covers most of screen surface | Basic install kit with centering issues |
Design
Belkin claims the ScreenForce UltraGlass 2 uses lithium aluminosilicate glass—a higher grade than standard aluminosilicate. But our crack tests suggest otherwise, with break patterns more similar to basic tempered glass. It covers 92.33% of the iPhone’s front surface (slightly below average), and while the edges are more polished than previous Belkin products, they’re still not ideal.
Installation was another letdown. The kit includes just the basics: frame, microfiber cloth, and dust stickers. The install frame didn’t center the protector well, so we had to realign it ourselves—disappointing for a “premium” product.
Performance
Performance-wise, this screen protector ranks #14. Clarity retention is 0.92, which is above average and a strong point. But the rest of the results are less impressive. Glare increased by 10.98%, nearly double the test group average. That’s enough to be noticeable in everyday use.
The oleophobic coating was one of the worst we tested. Oil droplets took 54.43 seconds to slide 6cm (much slower than average), and they left behind a streaky trail. That combo—slow and streaky—means the surface won’t stay clean easily and will need frequent wiping.
Protection
For protection, the Belkin ScreenForce UltraGlass 2 ranks #10. It held up to scratches at 7H, which is expected for aluminosilicate glass, but not exceptional. Edge durability was mediocre, requiring 67.14N to break (well below the 86.18N average). Impact testing came in at 237.5N—again, below average.
In short, despite Belkin’s claim of enhanced glass durability, our results don’t show any real-world improvements. The protector performs more like a mid-range tempered glass than an advanced composite material.
Value
At $40 for a single screen protector, the Belkin ScreenForce UltraGlass 2 is clearly priced as a premium product. Unfortunately, it doesn’t deliver premium results. Its clarity is fine, and it has an antibacterial coating—but poor coating performance, basic installation tools, and below-average edge and impact protection hold it back.
Verdict
Belkin’s ScreenForce UltraGlass 2 is a product with premium branding and average performance. For $40, we expect better coating, stronger edges, and easier installation. Unless you’re drawn to the antibacterial marketing or you’re a die-hard Belkin fan, we recommend spending your money on something more consistent and well-rounded.