Top 5 iPhone 16 Screen Protectors of 2025

We’ve tested over 20 screen protectors for iPhone, and no, we’re not talking about peeling and sticking one on and calling it a day. We measured everything—clarity, glare, edge strength, scratch resistance, even how annoying the install tools were. Monty and I aren’t influencers. We review things, we test things. And after all that, here are the top 5 screen protectors for iPhone in 2025 that actually deserve your money.

5. ESR Tempered Glass

ProsCons
Very affordable Inconsistent build quality
Excellent center impact resistance Weak edge strength
High clarity Poor oleophobic coating
Low glare Minimal screen coverage
Flat edges chip easily

ESR’s protector is basically the unreliable friend—fun one day, lets you down the next. It’s got impressive center impact strength (316.5N) but paper-thin edge strength (just 52.76N). You’ll get a 3-pack for just $9.99, so it’s dirt cheap, but there’s a reason.

Installation? Basic. One frame for all three protectors, and just one microfiber cloth. Dust problems? You bet. It only covers 92.21% of the iPhone’s front and misses part of the display. The edges? Flat and prone to chipping.

Now here’s the weird part—clarity is stellar at 93%, and glare only increases by 1.91%. But then the oleophobic coating absolutely bombs. Oil streaks everywhere. So yeah, ESR delivers highs and lows, sometimes in the same breath.

4. Tocol Screen Protector

ProsCons
Strong edge protection Thick black border covers pixels
Above-average clarity Weaker center impact resistance
Decent glare control Confusing installation frame
Good oleophobic coatingInconsistent durability
Reasonable price

This one’s your athletic friend with glass shoulders. It looks solid—strong edge protection (121.5N) and slightly better-than-average clarity at 91%. It covers 93.5% of the iPhone’s front, but those thick black edges? They cover pixels, and that’s a problem.

Installation was quirky. The frame design isn’t super intuitive, and if you press in the wrong spot, you’ll trap air bubbles in the middle. The good news? The oleophobic coating is great—droplets slide well, and smudges don’t linger.

The downside is the center impact strength. At 245.5N, it’s below average. But honestly, most cracks start at the edge, so we’ll take strong edges over strong center glass. It’s $16.99 for a 2-pack, and overall, it’s a decent buy—just not the most consistent.

3. Wsken Screen Protector

ProsCons
Strong edge and center protectionThick border slightly cuts off display
Glare reduction Average clarity
Unique but effective oleophobic coatingSlow oil droplet movement
Easy installation with large tray
Good coverage

Wsken’s that gym bro with the V-taper—strong, sleek, and mostly solid. Installation was smooth thanks to a wide frame and solid dust tools. It covers 94.01% of the iPhone’s front, but again, pixel coverage takes a hit with thicker-than-average borders.

Clarity clocks in at 0.90—average—but the real win is glare. This one actually *reduces* it by 1.41%, while most add 5–6%. The coating? Odd. Oil droplets move slow (75s!) but leave barely any residue. Not bad, just weird.

Protection-wise, it’s a beast. Edges take 121.1N, and center impact strength is 290.7N—both above average. $21.98 for a 2-pack gets you great durability, unique glare performance, and a pretty slick install experience. If only it didn’t block pixels.

2. UltraGlass

ProsCons
Top-tier clarity Higher glare
Strong edge and center protectionSlight pixel loss from bezels
Good oleophobic coatingOne frame shared for two protectors
Reliable install tools and extrasNot the most budget-friendly ($30.98 for 2-pack)

This one’s the jock—good at everything, but not exactly headed to the Hall of Fame. Install was clean, tools were solid, and they throw in plenty of dust stickers. Just don’t lose the frame—it’s one frame for two protectors.

Coverage is 93.62%, and it ties for #1 in clarity (0.93). But it does add more glare than most—+8.29%. The oleophobic coating holds its own, though—oil slides slow but doesn’t leave much behind.

Protection is second only to one. Edges are strong at 150.7N, and the center glass handles 296.5N of impact. It’s $30.98 for a 2-pack—not the cheapest, but you’re paying for consistency across all major categories.

1. FloLab NanoArmor 6

ProsCons
Best-in-class glare reductionPremium price
Tied for highest clarity
Exceptional oleophobic coating
Best edge and center strength in test group
Pixel-perfect coverage
Smart install tools, huge dust sticker

The NanoArmor 6 is the superhero of iPhone screen protectors. The install frame is intuitive and clear, but the game-changer is the massive dust sticker. Instead of dabbing at dust and stirring up more, this thing just works.

It covers 94.61% of the iPhone’s front and is the only black-edged protector I’ve tested that doesn’t block a single pixel. Clarity is tied for best at 93%, and the oleophobic coating leaves almost no oil behind.

But what really blew us away? Glare. FloLab cuts it by 40%—while most protectors increase it by 5–6%. I’ve charted over 20 protectors, and nothing else comes close. Add in edge strength well above average, center impact over 300N, and scratch resistance near 8H, and you’ve got a top-tier product in every way.

At $39.95 for one, it’s definitely premium—but if you want the best iPhone screen protector in 2025, this is it. No question.


So there you have it—five screen protectors, all tested, measured, and ranked with zero fluff. Whether you’re after the most affordable option or the absolute best performer, there’s something here that fits your priorities. Personally, We’d rather spend a bit more once than keep swapping out cracked or dusty ones every few weeks. If you’re curious how the rest of the top 20 stacked up or want to see these in action, check out the full playlist on our Mobile Reviews Eh Youtube Channel. As always, choose what makes sense for *your* setup—but now, you’ve got the data to back it up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *